The Alienation of Land Act

15 Aug 2014

In the recent Constitutional Court case of Botha v Rich NO the court decided that a purchaser may force a transfer of land in terms of Section 27 of the Alienation of Land Act, provided that more than half the purchase price has been paid and that the purchaser is not in arrears. The court further held that the principle of good faith underlying the law of contract dictates that land should be transferred to a purchaser in this situation against the furnishing of appropriate guarantees, even if the purchaser is in arrears with installments.

Discuss Article with the Author

Recent Articles

The value of a Restraint of Trade in a business acquisition

The value of a Restraint of Trade in a business acquisition

Raising a Rule 6(5)(d)(iii) Notice Before the Rule 53 Record: An Irregular Step or a Competent Election?

Raising a Rule 6(5)(d)(iii) Notice Before the Rule 53 Record: An Irregular Step or a Competent Election?

When does a commercial dispute become an insolvency problem?

When does a commercial dispute become an insolvency problem?

Orange, green and red: The Nike sneaker that started a trademark fight

Orange, green and red: The Nike sneaker that started a trademark fight