Fairbridges Attorneys
  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Culture and Values
    • Transformation
    • International Alliances
  • Professionals
    • Directors
    • Consultants
    • Associate Directors
    • Senior Associates
    • Associates
  • Services
    • Commercial Law
    • Competition Law
    • Data Protection and Privacy Law
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Employment and Employee Benefits
    • Energy Law Services
    • Estates and Trusts
    • Immigration Services
    • Insurance, Reinsurance and Liability
    • Intellectual Property
    • Medical Law Services
    • Persons and Family Law
    • Property Law
    • Public / Administrative / Regulatory Law
    • Sports Law
    • Technology, Media & Communications (TMT)
  • News & Insights
  • Resources
    • Careers at Fairbridges
    • Draft your Will
    • Property Ownership and Transfer Calculators
    • Legal Notice
  • Contact
Select Page
Data Breach Triage and the Insurer’s first 72 hours

Data Breach Triage and the Insurer’s first 72 hours

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 19 Jun, 2026 | Data Privacy, Insights

By Jodi Poswelletski | Director For insurers, the question is no longer whether a data incident is possible. The more useful question is whether the organisation knows what it will do when personal information may already be at risk. This is the premise behind “data...
From Berlin with caution: AI and the blurred lines of trade mark use

From Berlin with caution: AI and the blurred lines of trade mark use

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 19 Jun, 2026 | Insights, Intellectual Property

By Chezanne Haigh | Consultant  There is a growing sense that courts are beginning to draw lines around artificial intelligence. The recent decision by the Berlin Regional Court II (Case No. 52 O 62/26 eV) is a good example of that shift. It may not have made...
Disagreeing with a Court Order is not a Compliance Strategy

Disagreeing with a Court Order is not a Compliance Strategy

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 17 Jun, 2026 | Commercial Litigation, Insights

By Wessel Robertson | Director A business may have strong reasons for disagreeing with a court order. The order may be commercially disruptive, operationally difficult, or, in the company’s view, wrong in law or fact. There may be grounds for appeal, variation,...
From Berlin with caution: AI and the blurred lines of trade mark use

“I Want to Thank Myself”

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 9 Jun, 2026 | Insights, Intellectual Property

By Chezanne Haigh | Consultant  When is a phrase worth protecting? When Mirra Andreeva lifted the French Open trophy, her tennis did most of the talking. Her jacket, however, made sure there was a little extra conversation. Across the back was a line that felt made...
Disagreeing with a Court Order is not a Compliance Strategy

No Second Bite. Court Confirms the Higher Threshold for Leave to Appeal

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 8 Jun, 2026 | Commercial Litigation, Insights

By Zolani Dhlamini | Director and Keitumetse Khutsoane | Associate In April 2026, the Pietermaritzburg High Court set aside a subpoena issued against the Auditor-General of South Africa (“AGSA”), finding that it had not been issued for a bona fide or lawful purpose...
From Berlin with caution: AI and the blurred lines of trade mark use

Is “Pattie Gonia” parody… or a brand too far?

by Lezaan van Jaarsveld | 3 Jun, 2026 | Insights, Intellectual Property

By Chezanne Haigh | Consultant  Images from Court Exhibit There’s something intriguing about the recent dispute between environmental drag artist Pattie Gonia and outdoor apparel giant Patagonia that goes beyond a typical trademark case. On paper, it looks...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

  • Legal Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • News
  • B-BBEE Certificate
Copyright 2026 Fairbridges | All Rights Reserved.