The Alienation of Land Act

15 Aug 2014

In the recent Constitutional Court case of Botha v Rich NO the court decided that a purchaser may force a transfer of land in terms of Section 27 of the Alienation of Land Act, provided that more than half the purchase price has been paid and that the purchaser is not in arrears. The court further held that the principle of good faith underlying the law of contract dictates that land should be transferred to a purchaser in this situation against the furnishing of appropriate guarantees, even if the purchaser is in arrears with installments.

Discuss Article with the Author

Recent Articles

Estate Duty Planning Between Spouses

Estate Duty Planning Between Spouses

When Private Conduct Becomes a Public Standard of Accountability

When Private Conduct Becomes a Public Standard of Accountability

Guarantee or Suretyship?

Guarantee or Suretyship?

Constitutional Court Confirms Limits on Labour Appeals and Awards Costs in Dispute Arising from Terminated Municipal Services Agreement

Constitutional Court Confirms Limits on Labour Appeals and Awards Costs in Dispute Arising from Terminated Municipal Services Agreement